Another week another beheading another advance of IS
Meanwhile the #notinmyname bandwagon repeats that these are not representative of true M's
Yes - we do not expect that M’s everywhere need to state again, every time it happens, that it is nothing to do with you.
However - IS and Al-Q and the rest are not real M but western M's are? Rubbish. They are M just as you are. Accept it.
They and their teachers simply choose to emphasise different parts of the book to you and your teachers. They might choose to take certain bits literally, you might choose to ignore certain bits, should we have an objective competition to see who adheres more?
It is not simply a case of numbers here, of IS being only a small minority. You know full well that even your definition of whether you are a true believer is not defined by democracy.
There are explicit passages that they use to explicitly justify their actions.
They believe their interpretation of the book as you believe yours.
Wednesday, October 08, 2014
Every new system we build is by definition new, therefore not clearly defined, therefore subject to change.
During many years trying to develop massive princely systems, I always believed there was a more agile way.
From the agile manifesto, my personal top five:
1. Released development is the measure of progress.
2. Welcome changing requirements - even late in development.
3. The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams.
4. Promote sustainable development - should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
5. Simplicity - minimizing the amount of work done.
And to prove this is the right approach - wherever a group is relatively free from red tape, as in some business units who happen to be independent of formal IT, this is how we develop.